One third of my English Literature exams is to study
William Blake's Songs of Innocence and Experience, a collection of poems
published in the late 18th century that explored what Blake believed to be the
two contrary states of the human soul: Innocence and Experience. Blake believed
that, "Without contraries there is no progression", meaning that we
need both Innocence and Experience to see the world for what it is.
One of his most
notable pieces in this collection is a Song of Experience called London. London
was written during the French and Industrial Revolutions, and this is evident
with the themes of violence and corruption running throughout. REMEMBER: it is
always important to note the context of a literary piece in order to understand
the messages being conveyed by its author.
London
I wander thro' each
charter'd street,
Near where the
charter'd Thames does flow
And mark in every
face I meet
Marks of weakness,
marks of woe.
In every cry of every
Man,
In every Infants cry
of fear,
In every voice; in
every ban,
The mind-forg'd
manacles I hear
How the Chimney-sweepers
cry
Every blackning
Church appalls,
And the hapless
Soldiers sigh
Runs in blood down
Palace walls
But most thro'
midnight streets I hear
How the youthful
Harlots curse
Blasts the new-born
Infants tear
And blights with
plagues the Marriage hearse
I would say that this is Blake's most striking and
powerful poem of the entire collection; the tone of social indictment carries
weight and relentlessly targets the Church and the State, their hypocrisy and
utter corruption. It is so distinctive from Blake's work, that even the
American playwright Arthur Miller, who was accused of writing works with
Communist themes, stated the following:
"There is more understanding of the nature of
Capitalist society in a poem like, "I wander thro' each charter'd street"
than in the whole of Socialist literature."
So what is it about London that led Miller to draw this conclusion?
Bring on the analysis...
Form and Structure
The consistent iambic tetrameter with a regular ABAB rhyme scheme gives the poem a rigid structure and an insistent drum-like beat which puts stresses on important points of the poem, and it also serves as a slight variation of the ballad form.
Stanza One
The poem starts with the personal pronoun
"I", immediately turning the poem into a first-person narrative to
make it a personal experience of the speaker.
In the poem's original draft, the word
"charter'd" was dirty, which would have presented the imagery of a
black, dirty, decrepit London transformed by the Industrial Revolution.
Instead, the repetition of "charter'd" communicates the restrictive
effects of charters and the corporations of the business world forced on the
individual.
The repetition of "mark" has been
interpreted as the Seal of God in Ezekiel 9:4.
"He said to him, "Walk through the streets
of Jerusalem and put a mark on the foreheads of all who weep and sigh because
of the detestable sins being committed in their city."
It may also reference the mark of the beast, i.e. the
sinners. Some have also interpreted it to be the brand of a slave, as if the
people of London are enslaved to the State.
Stanza Two
The anaphora of "In every cry" illustrates
the social evils that were condoned by the Church in their utter hypocrisy,
while building up to the climax of the final line.
The accumulation of stresses on "mind-forg'd
manacles" emphasises this phrase as a key point of the poem. The
"manacles" are shackles, or a means of oppression, and because they
are "mind-forg'd", this suggests they are self-imposed. This line has
caught the attention of many Marxist critics, including Louis Althusser who
said:
"Ideology represents the imaginary relationship
of individuals to their real conditions of existence."
Therefore, these manacles are a restriction of false
consciousness that Blake wishes Londoners would break away from so they may
recognise the political forces oppressing them and seek freedom. As Blake wrote
in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell:
"If the doors of perception were cleansed, every
thing would appear to man as it is, infinite."
Stanza Three
This stanza transforms intangible woe into tangible imprints on society. The sweep's "cry" becomes a stain of the "blackning" Church, whose walls are "appalled" by the social injustices the Church self-servingly condones.
The soldiers' "sigh" transforms into
"blood" running down "Palace walls", which is Blake
indicting the King and despotic leaders in killing soldiers in their wars. The
metre changes to trochaic to emphasise this point.
This line also holds contextual significance as the
French Revolution was taking place at the time of its publication, which
initially inspired Blake as a radical libertarian.
Stanza Four
The poem reaches a climax in this final stanza as it
reaches its most important point.
Blake presents an uncomfortable imagery in describing
"youthful Harlots", AKA young prostitutes who have had their childhood
robbed from them as they have been forced into prostitution.
Their "curse" can be interpreted literally;
that they are swearing. Or this "curse" can be interpreted as being
their job.
Blake then presents an apocalyptic vision: the
consequences of regulating free love. Blake uses plosive sounds in
"Blasts", "plagues", "blights" to create a harsh
tone in this section. "Blasts" are a reference to the venereal
disease gonorrhea, with which the prostitutes have infected the
"Infant", and the reference to "tear" is blindness, which
was a common symptom of the disease.
It was then passed on to their clientele, who were
typically married, and then passed on to their wives and children, thereby
creating a "plague" of the disease.
In the final line, Blake unites the two sacraments,
marriage and love, in a macabre oxymoron subversion of the marriage bed;
instead it becomes a "Marriage hearse" of death in marriage because
of venereal disease.
So that's London "summed up", I hope this
helps! I'll be posting more of my notes from the Songs.
No comments:
Post a Comment