Like with
his predecessors, Brezhnev faced many issues with agriculture, but arguably
went to a greater effort to solve them.
He
recognised that agricultural underperformance and rural poverty posed a major
problem for the economy. This was being made worse by movement of younger,
potentially more productive peasants to towns, with better conditions. Peasants
were treated like second-class citizens. Discriminatory measures against them
were reversed and there were other reforms.
-
Peasants were given internal passports for the first
time – could move home and become eligible for same social security benefits as
urban workers.
·
Reduced but didn’t eliminate gap in living standards
between urban areas and countryside. Consumer goods still less likely to be
available
-
Rationalisation of administration of framing: farms
given slightly fewer plan targets to meet
-
Fewer restrictions on private plots
-
End to Khrushchev’s experiments
-
Attempt to integrate farms more closely with rural
industries towards the end.
-
Also attempts to link income more closely to results,
groups of peasants worked in small brigades.
·
But didn’t significantly boost output
-
Increased investment in agriculture
·
Over 26% of state investment in 1976-80 compared to
20% in 1960-65.
·
Overall state investment in agriculture tripled during
Brezhnev era, but poorer return
This
had mixed results:
-
Rapid rise in output
·
In 1970s USSR was world’s largest wheat producer.
-
But gains slowed and returns to investment input declined.
-
Soviet citizens earned more, but increased demand led to shortages in
food shops controlled by state.
-
Prices in collective farm markets run by peasants more than doubled.
-
The government were reluctant to risk unpopularity in raising prices to
regulate demand
·
Increasing gap between supply and demand for food, increased dependence
on foreign imports (wheat)
Therefore
although agriculture initially underwent a positive change, like most other
areas during Brezhnev’s era, it stagnated and had social implications as well.
My conclusion would be that moderate change
was made, but to limited success.
No comments:
Post a Comment