In this section we will look over one
of the many areas of Brezhnev’s era and the extent to which it had changed by
1982: social policy. There are many (boring) layers to social policy to
explore, the most likely to come up is dissidence and nationalities so as dull
as it may be, it is important to revise!
The 1977 Brezhnev Constitution
-
The
USSR was previously governed by Stalin’s 1936 Constitution
-
The
draft Constitution had 150 amendments
made to it after 400,000 suggestions
-
The
role of the Party given prominent role, “the
leading and guiding force in Soviet society and the nucleus of the political
system, of all State and public organisations.”
·
Had
the role of supervising all enterprises and institutions
-
Guarantees
of freedom of speech, assembly, religion, press and individual conscience
·
Important
proviso – rights of individual citizens “must not injure interests of society
and state and rights of other citizens”
-
Socialist
democracy = “for the first time in the history of civilised society, the mass
of the population will rise to take an independent part, not only in voting and
elections, but also in the everyday administration of the State.”
-
The
Constitution was adopted by each Republic, and a promise was made that
Republican languages would be officially recognised.
-
BUT
– limited, only the State decided what the “interests of society” were. They
could quash appeals to individual rights on the basis this was against national
or other interest.
·
Individual
rights were “inseparable from the performance by the citizen of his
obligations” – determined by State alone (e.g. conscription)
·
The
Constitution prohibited “the incitement of hostility and hatred in connection
with religious beliefs” gave the Party free rein to interfere in religious
practices.
Although at the time it seemed to be
propaganda and vapid, it allowed Gorbachev to “introduce the notion separation
of powers” (Keep) following Brezhnev’s death through the possibility of later
amendments.
Social Change
-
Urban
population significantly rose between 1964-1982
·
Soviet
citizens living in towns rose from 53% to 64%
-
Over
300 towns in the Russian Federation were dependent on one industry and the
workforce was almost exclusively female
·
Male
unemployment higher than national average, nat. average = 13%
-
Adults
with higher secondary/further educational qualifications steadily grew
·
But
blue-collar workers often earned more than white-collar professionals like
doctors and teachers, it became difficult for people to advance to a level that
matched their qualifications
-
Life
expectancy fell (alcoholism, consequences of environmental pollution)
-
Birth
rate fell below the necessary level to sustain the population in the long run –
one cause was shortage of men from war.
·
Village
women with any ambition tried to move elsewhere (even Siberia!), where wages
were higher.
-
Meanwhile
populations in the Republics with large Muslim population rose rapidly.
·
In
the 10 years after 1970s the Russian population grew by 6.5%, the Tajik population grew 37.5%
-
Relatively
little labour mobility across regions, labour surplus in Central Asia wasn’t
used to solve this
-
Always
shortage of agricultural labour despite the disparity in income between town
and countryside reduced considerably
Living and Working Conditions
-
Gradual
increase in overall standard of living during Brezhnev’s rule
·
During
K – 40% of Soviets lived in shared/communal apartments, by 1985 this was 15-18%
·
1967
– five-day working week became the norm
·
Holidays
increased from 12 to 15 working days
-
Minimum
wage increase
· Real
wages, what people could actually buy, increased by 50%.
·
1968
– minimum wage was 60 roubles per month.
·
Doctor/teacher
would earn double that
·
Manager
of industrial enterprise would earn 600
·
Government/party
officials earned 800 and had access to special privileges
-
Consumption
of fish, meat and vegetables increased 50%
-
Evidence
of broad level of satisfaction with material conditions
·
Soviet
citizens who had emigrated expressed satisfaction with job security, social
security and educational provision of their previous existence
·
Complaints
focused on propaganda, limits on cultural, religious and intellectual freedom,
petty restrictions and rigidity of previous lives
·
But
there were local food shortages, leading to demonstrations and indicating
significant problems
-
Disparities
between different regions
·
Highest
economic growth rates in Belorussia & Moldavia, the lowest in Azerbaijan,
Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan.
·
Baltic
Republics did well. Collective farm workers in Estonia bucked the trend
elsewhere, earning double the average for the USSR as a whole.
·
Baltic
inhabitants were increasingly more likely to live longer than other Soviets.
·
Babies
in Turkmenistan were five times more likely to die than in Latvia. Alcohol
abuse wasn’t a major issue in Central Asian Republics, but was a major concern
in European Republics.
-
High
divorce rates from cramped housing conditions and increasing dissatisfaction in
women’s domestic role.
·
But
major factor was alcohol abuse, which compromised 40-50% of divorce pleas.
·
In
urban European Russian, one in two marriages ended in divorce.
·
Led
to increasing numbers of single parent families and growing concerns of youth
issues (hooliganism and delinquency)
-
There
was an ageing population and rise in infant mortality, and drop in life
expectancy (especially for men), because men were more likely than women to die
from alcohol poisoning, accidents or stress-related issues in contrast to
developed world
·
Home-brewed
spirits led to alcohol-related deaths
·
Alcohol-related
concerns led to pressure on social services and didn’t help the strained
economy.
·
This
was compounded by decline in proportion of State budget on health care, while
defence remained high.
·
Doctors
and nurses were reported as lacking motivation and sensitivity and prone to
taking bribes.
·
Sometimes
necessary to bribe hospital to gain admission. They were notoriously under
equipped and badly run. Statistics kept secret BUT almost certainly a rise in
rate of serious diseases (cancer and hepatitis)
Regime coy about revealing details
(hard to quantify impact of social concerns) and even pretended problems (e.g.
drug abuse) didn’t exist, claimed it was caused by inequalities of capitalism
that no longer existed in socialist world.
Women
-
Shared
material gains of population at large, but had rough deal compared to men.
·
This
was not a new development, second-class citizens since 1917 Revolution.
·
Had
constantly helped economy in workforce, success of war and reconstruction
undermined without them.
-
In
1970s, women formed 45% of workforce, but disproportionately confined to
less-skilled, low-paid jobs and less educated
-
Laws
protecting them from excessively physically demanding jobs were ignored
·
Higher
percentage of women employed in manual tasks or construction
-
Women
dominated several professions
·
99%
of typists and nurses, 74% of doctors, 72% of schoolteachers - lowest paid professions
-
Many
women complained about their situation but authorities ignored absence of
“socialist equality”
-
1970
– census revealed 70% of Soviet women had full-time jobs outside home.
-
Few
ever reached the top (especially in politics).
·
After
1945 only one women held a top political post: Katerine Furtseva, a Politburo
member and minister for culture 1957-60
-
Women
complained that despite their massive contribution to the economy, they
shouldered the burden of housework, because the Soviet man was reluctant to
contribute to household chores.
·
1970s
– women shoppers (3/4 of total shoppers) spent on average 21 eight-hour days seeking
supplies
·
Women
spent 27 hours a week on housework, men spent less than 12
·
Women
had one less hour a day for necessary activities like eating and sleeping.
-
Blatant
inequalities were major factor for high divorce rate. Also explains why, if
they were educated, they became reluctant to marry
And that’s Brezhnev social policy
just about covered. Remember to back up your points with lots of evidence to
win over the examiner’s confidence, you’ll get more marks for that! My overall
conclusion for this section would be that while at the time there was definite
change, but not to a great extent, this allowed Gorbachev to later bring in
policies like Glasnost and Political Perestroika in continuity.
No comments:
Post a Comment